Epson Stylus Pro 5500 tabloid sized 11 x 17 inch inkjet printer for
portrait photography
An Epson Stylus
Pro 5500 inkjet printer arrived at the FLAAR evaluation facilities.
Prior to this our only knowledge of this printer was from people who
already had one. It is a natural human tendency to send a "letter
to the editor" primarily when a person runs into a weak point
or flaw. Since we initially liked this printer's output at tradeshows
we felt the model 5500 would get a fairer review if we had one in
our own facility. Otherwise all we hear about are from the occasional
user who writes us about their problems.
Often it is lack
of training, the wrong media, or unrealistic expectations. That's
why we prefer to have the printers in our own printing studio. This
way we can find out what a printer does well, in addition to whatever
inherent structural or technological glitches it may exhibit.
The
FLAAR editor also got an opportunity to inspect the new Epson
Stylus Pro 5500 desktop printer at PMA trade
show in mid-February. 2880 dpi with variable droplet. This is
the newest version of the Epson printers. The Epson 5500 is a desktop
size, 11x17 (can handle paper up to 13 x 19 inches). Actually the
Epson 5500 can handle paper up to 200 LB weight in bond stock. The
targeted market is for portrait photography, where rather obviously
the clients don't want fast fade ink.
One alternative
for desktop printing is the nice Canon 8500 but it lacks pigmented
inks (Canon can take only dye inks). However if you need really bright
flashy colors for something that does not need to stay on the wall
more than a few weeks, check out the Canon. For pigmented inks, HP
does not make any desktop model at all with pigmented inks. Thus for
photographers, not much choice other than the Epson 5500.
We are not enamored
with any EFI Fiery RIP. They are overpriced for what little they offer.
We recommend BESTColor RIP or any of the other good after-market RIP´s. Yes, it is
true that you can operate any Epson printer without absolutely needing
a RIP but in the long run most professional users will need to acquire
a RIP sooner or later. Why? Check out the FLAAR
Premium Report Series on RIP´s
The newer model
2200 came out after the issue of metamerism became such an issue on
the 7500
and 9500.
Due to the publicity Epson is working at minimizing the problem. Everyone
spells metemerism differently, but metamerism is the proper spelling.
Epson is aware of this issue. So Epson hardware engineers, software
engineers, and ink chemists have obviously been working hard to address
metamerism. Of course no one can escape the laws of physics or the
basic principles of color, but Epson itself now claims they have overcome
the worst aspects of metamerism in the new printers such as the 2200.
Of course this
is easy to test. If we find out first hand that the 5500 is improved
over the 7500, and if we subsequently see with our own analysis that
the Epson 10000 has also overcome this issue, we will be the first
to report it. Indeed FLAAR is now preparing an entire special report
on metamerism. In the meantime, we can already report that the Epson
Stylus Pro 5500 already includes upgrades and improvements over the
Epson
1520, the Epson
3000, and the Epson
5000. In turn, the 2200 and 7600 are superior in all respects.
Unfortunately
the Epson 5500 is not accepted by European photographers. They report
that the color gamut is not enough. We had it confirmed from elsewhere
in Europe and also by two color management people in the USA, that
the color gamut of both the 5500 and 2000p were weak. The 5500 has
evidently long been discontinued in Germany and Belgium. The photographer
who had one in Switzerland liked it at first, until he saw that it
was incapable of reproducing the color range he needed. So he got
rid of it.
It remains to
be seen whether these images will hold up if not sealed in glass.
Ozone (emitted by laser printers and prepress plate burners), cigarette
smoke, and other contaminants in normal room air can cause the ink
and/or paper to deteriorate in some instances. As we get more facts
on all of this, we will update this page. In the meantime, be sure
to seal your prints in UV glass. That gets a bit expensive, but now
even the small-print in Epson ads recommend this.
Last
checked : Sept. 23, 2003
Previous updates: Jan. 15, 2003, Oct. 21, 2002